While all common development agreements should address the above issues, there is no single model. This is certainly the case in sectors such as energy, technology and life sciences, where companies often enter into research and development agreements with a number of different partners. The agreement depends on the nature of the partner unit. Other provisions relating to the definition of the parties` ownership interests may be introduced as part of joint development work. Cooperation is a key strategy for the growth of many companies in certain sectors such as energy, technology and life sciences, where research and development are essential to maintain a competitive advantage, but can be incredibly expensive to do. Cooperation in research and development enables companies to reduce costs and gather the best ideas and information from both parties. The first thing that should be addressed in a common development agreement is the intellectual property created by joint development. What does each party own exclusively and what does it have? This must be implemented in a signed agreement. For example, the parties may agree that one party owns all of the intellectual property, while granting the other party exclusive marketing rights in certain areas. In another case, the parties may consent to any ip holder directly related to its core intellectual property, which has been introduced in cooperation, and to the remaining intellectual property held jointly by both parties. In this regard, it is important that the parties understand the ip origins of each party that contributed to the cooperation and the substantive IPs that were not brought in.
"News feeds are very useful for me in the areas where I practice. The quality of the material is very good and the news feeds give a brief overview of the latest developments. A common method is to include language in the JDA, which states that while each party has its own substantive IP, the other party only obtains a license for the substantive IP to the extent that it is necessary for the exercise of the jointly developed IP. This essentially protects the owner of the background IP from having to license its background IP wide, while protecting the other party by allowing it to fully exploit the intellectual property developed in common. James Arnold, Jr. is AN IP CONSEILLER for BASF ENZYMES in San Diego, CA. He received his B.A. in Chemistry with awards from Talladega College, J.D.
Published by: admin